Ask My Candidates- Response From Daniel W Thatcher

http://redertainment.blogspot.com/2014/10/ask-my-candidates.html

Ten minutes after sending him the message, I received a response from Daniel W. Thatcher

Today is the 3rd Wednesday of the month, which means the Legislature is in session today. I will be in meetings all day. Would you like me to call you sometime tomorrow?  

Thank you for writing, 

Sen. Daniel W. Thatcher

His response included his phone number, but I didn't know if he wanted that posted so I didn't inlcude it.  Here is my response back:

Thank you for getting back to me so quickly.  I am pleasantly surprised by your quick response.  My availability for a phone call is limited by the fact that I work evenings, but if mid-day, preferably before 1 PM, works for you my number is (xxx) xxx-xxxx.  Also, I was looking for a written statement from you about this matter so that I can post it to my blog.

Also, I have posted your quick response to my blog.

Thank you
Hunter Red

I look forward to Senator Thatcher's response as well as hearing back from Clare Collard.

Ask My Candidates

Terror threat against feminist Anita Sarkeesian at USU

Feminist, Gaming Critic Cancels Utah State Speech after Massacre Threat


I find this incident to be disgraceful and personally embarrassing.  It shames me that officials at Utah State University were unable to provide adequate security for this event after a substantial threat was made against it due to my state's laws regulating guns.  But what can I do about it?  Really, what?


The laws that prevented officials at Utah State University from providing what Miss Sarkeesian felt would be adequate security for this even come courtesy of the Utah State Legislature and the politicians who represent the people of Utah.  As election time is fast approaching, there are currently many candidates vying to represent the people of Utah.



In my district, the race is between Clare Collard, pictured above, and Daniel W. Thatcher, also pictured above.  I was able to easily find an email address for both of these candidates, and sent the following email this morning:

Dear (Insert Candidate Name Here),


Yesterday an planned speech at Utah State University was cancelled by controversial Feminist Anita Sarkeesian.  According to a statement by the University, the move was made after Miss Sarkeesian was informed that due to Utah state law persons with concealed firearms permit would still be allowed to carry their firearms into the event.  Due to this, Miss Sarkeesian felt that her safety could not be guaranteed, especially given the substantive threats made in the past against her in the past.

In light of such an event and the inability for University to provide security that the speaker felt was adequate to the situation, do you feel that state laws regulating firearms need to be addressed?  I'd also like to know why you feel this way.

Full disclosure, I plan to make a post to my blog stating that I had sent you this email, as well as posting any response that you send me.  The reason that I am doing this is to show that ordinary citizens can get a response from their local politicians if only those citizens put forth the effort.

Thank you for your time
Hunter Red

I look forward to their responses.

Rethinking My Approach


Lately I've been reading a tumblr called Straight White Boy Texting.  This tumblr consists mostly of screen captures of conversations had between men and women where the men say things that are creepy, sexually aggressive, or otherwise just plain wrong.  Reading through these messages has caused me to rethink the way that I talk to people on the internet, most especially the way I talk to women.  Yesterday I came across something that made me rethink my communications even further.

The Benevolent Stalker


In this post on his personal blog, Richard Brittain, an English quiz show champion, writes about how he once stalked a woman.  He writes about how he pursued her, was rebuffed by her, and kept on pursuing her in ways that some people are calling disturbing.  What struck me about this post is that Richard appears to be in no way coerced into writing this post.  Richard appears to be writing honestly in his own words, and in his honesty he is admitting to doing things that are in no way socially acceptable.  Take for instance this passage:

I wrote love letters to her. I still had her address from the forms that she filled out for University Challenge. I felt a bit guilty using that information, but I wasn’t turning up at her door or anything. I sent a few love letters through the post, rose-themed cards containing poetry and drawings. I also left messages on her phone.

He wrote that.  Richard wrote that himself.  In his post Richard admits to stalking this woman, and also appears to be unappologetic about doing so, which is seen in this passage:

It seems that modern society drools over depictions of this intense, obsessional love, but only when it is mutual. When it comes from just one side, it is suddenly deemed a terrible thing.
When I was listening to The Beatles, I realised that a lot of their early music suited my mood. Much of it is about being utterly obsessed with a particular woman:
“I’ll get you, I’ll get you in the end,
Yes I will, I’ll get you in the end,
Oh yeah, oh yeah,
Well, there’s gonna be a time,
When I’m gonna change your mind,
So you might as well resign yourself to me,
Oh yeah.”
Are the Beatles creepy stalkers? Of course not. How about Sting?
“Every breath you take,
Every move you make,
Every bond you break,
Every step you take,
I’ll be watching you.”
These songs are about obsessional love, which is both natural and beautiful. Benevolent stalking is different to malevolent stalking. The latter is intended to cause harm or induce fear, but the former is purely an expression of affection.
Richard doesn't seem to understand that what he did is wrong, and is even constructing arguments trying to excuse his behavior.  This is what is making me rethink the way that I communicate with people.  Perhaps I am doing something that is egregiously wrong but lack the perspective on myself to recognize it.  There's nothing in particular that stands out to me but something might stand out to someone else.  I want to be a better person but have only tried, up to this point, through what I believe to be thorough and honest introspection.  Another person's perspective may be necessary to ensure that I am not doing something in my personal conduct that is, in the starkest context of the term, wrong.

Differing AP


Occasionally you come across something that you wouldn't see any place else.  Sometimes you come across something that screams to you "This would only happen at home."

‘Meet the Mormons’ 10th at box office with $2.9M, ‘Gone Girl’ No. 1

Yep, that's Salt Lake.  The Salt Lake Tribune.  I wonder how the LDS Church owned Deseret News reported that story.

'Gone Girl' tops box office for second weekend; 'Meet the Mormons' at No. 10


Wait a minute, both of these articles are from the same Associated Press wire story but the headlines are different.  Let's see how the story looks at the source.


Huh.  So the source of the article makes no mention of Meet The Mormons in the headline but both of my local sources who ran the story did.  Also, Meet The Mormons is not not mentioned, except as a part of a list, when the same article was ran by the Portland Press Herald, New York Daily News, Winston-Salem Journal, and Moviefone.  Guess it pays to get multiple sources.